happily stuck in ithaca header
Tuesday, February 24, 2004

And the responses...
I'm sure as you know by now... Dubbya has endorsed a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

John Kerry's "Official Response"
“I believe President Bush is wrong. All Americans should be concerned when a President who is in political trouble tries to tamper with the Constitution of the United States at the start of his reelection campaign.

This President can’t talk about jobs. He can’t talk about health care. He can’t talk about a foreign policy, which has driven away allies and weakened the United States, so he is looking for a wedge issue to divide the American people.

While I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, for 200 years, this has been a state issue. I oppose this election year effort to amend the Constitution in an area that each state can adequately address, and I will vote against such an amendment if it comes to the Senate floor.

I believe the best way to protect gays and lesbians is through civil unions. I believe the issue of marriage should be left to the states, and that the President of the United States should be addressing the central challenges where he has failed – jobs, health care, and our leadership in the world rather than once again seeking to drive a wedge by toying with the United States Constitution for political purposes.”


John Edwards' "Official Response"
"I oppose gay marriage. I also oppose President Bush's attempt to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage. Washington has no business playing politics with this issue. Marriage is left to the states today, and should remain with the states.

I'm not surprised that the day after he kicked off his campaign, the president is already talking about gay marriage. He can't talk about jobs, because he has no new ideas to create jobs. He can't talk about health care, because he has no new ideas to hold down costs or cover every child. He can't talk about education, because he has no new ideas to help young people pay for the soaring cost of college.

If President Bush wants to stand up for marriage, he ought to help millions of married couples who are living paycheck to paycheck. If he wants to stand up for marriage, he should tackle the marriage penalty that punishes poor families when they marry. He should help middle-class families save and invest. But instead of offering new ideas to help the families who are actually married, President Bush wants to play politics with the Constitution.

We have had our Constitution for more than 200 years. We amended it to abolish slavery and ensure women could vote. We should not amend it over politics."


Log Cabin Republicans [Stop laughing!]
"Writing discrimination into the Constitution is wrong. It is not conservative, it is not Republican, and it will not strengthen America.

As conservative Republicans, we are outraged that any Republican—particularly the leader of our party and this nation—would support any effort to use our sacred United States Constitution as a way of scoring political points in an election year."

* Candidate Bush promised in 2000 to be a “uniter, not a divider.” The effort to write discrimination into our Constitution with an anti-family amendment would divide America.

* Candidate Bush ran as a compassionate conservative. There is nothing compassionate about discriminating against part of the American family. And there is nothing conservative about tinkering with our Constitution.

* Candidate Bush ran as a governor who supported Federalism and states’ rights. This anti-family amendment runs counter to both those principles. And it runs counter to what Vice-President Cheney said during the 2000 campaign. Instead of allowing each state to decide this issue on its own, the President is pushing a purely political proposal to appease the radical right."


Stonewall Democrats
National Stonewall Democrats today strongly condemned President Bush for formally endorsing the federal anti-marriage amendment. The amendment would prevent states and the federal government from granting the legal incidents of marriage to same-sex couples. Such legal incidents include hospital visitation rights, child support, health care benefits, inheritance rights, and would prevent all forms of civil marriage and civil unions for such couples.

"President Bush fails to understand that our families are more than political red meat that he can throw before his anti-gay base," said Dave Noble, NSD Executive Director. "The President has clearly demonstrated that it is no longer acceptable for our community to merely vote against this man. Each one of us now has the responsibility to actively work to deny him a second term."

In past weeks, the Washington Post cited Republican officials who stated that the announcement of the President's support resulted from "his desire to start the general election campaign on a fresh issue, at a time when his credibility has been battered by questions about prewar warnings of unconventional weapons in Iraq, as well as doubts raised by Democrats about his National Guard service." The paper also cited Republican officials as stating that by announcing his support, the President hoped to distinguish himself from the Democratic presidential front-runner, Senator John Kerry.


Focus On The Family [Rabidly Anti-Gay]
"President Bush’s endorsement of a federal marriage amendment today is the lynchpin in efforts to protect marriage in our country,” founder of Focus On The Family, Dobson said. “The president clearly understands that families formed through the union of one man and one woman are best for America and America’s children. His comments should signal to Congress and the states that only an amendment to the U.S. Constitution can adequately address the inevitable showdown between the courts and the will of the American people as expressed through their elected representatives.

“The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s tyrannical Goodridge ruling and the recent issuing of marriage licenses to same-sex couples in San Francisco and New Mexico has confirmed what we have long known — marriage as it as been understood throughout human history is under attack in this country. We applaud President Bush’s unequivocal support of a federal marriage amendment as the only solution to this constitutional crisis.”
| private feedback |



Comments:
Post a Comment

Hey! I'm Shane... a proud gay progressive Democrat who has recently relocated to New York City from Ithaca, NY. As I am no longer in Ithaca, I haven't quite decided the fate of this blog.

Drop me a line!
shane@happilystuckinithaca.com

Ithaca Directory


NY Politics '06
* Tompins County LGBT Dems
* Tompkins County Dem Committee
* New York State Dem Committee

State/National Politics
Hillary Clinton for President
Victory Fund
Daily Kos
Center for American Progress
Political Wire
The Note
National Stonewall Dems
New York Stonewall Dems
Progressive Democrats of America

Super blogs
Getting married, sort of...
StudioOneQ
Kathy Luz Herrera
Good As You
Queerty
Monkeyhutts
Ithaca Action Network
white male consumer
Elliott Back
Ithaca is Home
Living in Dryden
AlfredNYC
AarHead
drdjmike
JaseWells
Govind's Stochastic Comments
urbanskies.com
Joey Destino
Rebel Prince
donut jelly
Burnt Orange Report
Slouching Towards Banality
The Student Nurse
Quistilton Family Blog
Observe But Do Not Interfere
The Search for Love in Manhattan
ISleepInADrawer.com
That Happy Feeling
NYCO's Blog
greg3d
Tales of a Shrink

Blog search engines
Blogarama
Review My Site
Blog Search Engine
popdex
Blog Directory
eTalkingHead


Vote for this site at Freedom Forum



Site hosted by Dreamhost.
Highly recommended!
Green Web Hosting! This site hosted by DreamHost.

Archive
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
June 2007
November 2007