happily stuck in ithaca header
Sunday, October 31, 2004
What's good for Green Bay is good for Kerry
Cheri and I found the perfect table at our local sports bar, Benchwarmer's. No less than eight television sets were blaring right above our heads. Each one had a different NFL game on it.

To our right, the Houston Texans were playing the Jacksonville Jaguars. To our left, the Green Bay Packers were taking on the Washington Redskins. Cheri, being from Texas, roots on the Texans. But it was this second game that I was most interested in.

Since 1933, the result of the last Redskins home game before the presidential election has accurately predicted the winner. If the Redskins win, the incumbent party maintains the White House. If the challenger wins, the incumbent party is ousted. Could I be such a political junkie that I would spend a Sunday afternoon watching football games?

Apparently.

I wasn't disappointed. Green Bay came out strong from the very beginning, but the game still had some hairy moments... like when Washington scored a touchdown that would have given them the lead by one point, had there not been a flag and subsequent penalty. I sweated that one a little.

In good news for John Kerry (in a superstitious, horoscope-reading kind of way) Green Bay was victorious. The final score was Green Bay-28, Washington-14.
"Oh, yeah, he's going to win. It's guaranteed," said Packers safety Darren Sharper, a Kerry supporter. "I don't have to vote now. Don't even have to go to the polls. Saved me a trip on Tuesday."
Let's hope you're right Darren.

[CNN Sports: Redskins lose, so Kerry should win]
[NFL.com: Beleaguered Favre leads Pack past 'Skins]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Saturday, October 30, 2004
Democratic Headquarters
The Tompkins County Democratic Headquarters was a study in chaos today. Not because it was poorly organized, but for the simple fact that so much was going on. (The 'Democratic Party Machine' here is something to be in awe of.) So many people are lending their time and their talents to making sure that John Kerry wins big in Tompkins County, and wins the presidency.

[Four years ago in Tompkins County, Al Gore got 21,807 votes; George Bush got 13,351; and Ralph Nader got 4,548 with 79% voter turnout. (If I'm not mistaken, Bush got fewer votes than Nader in the City of Ithaca but I can't find the numbers to back that up.]

I've worked shifts the last three Saturdays. Today, teams of folks whose task was to blanket the county with brochures were coming in and out to pick up their materials. There was shift after shift of callers making "Get Out The Vote" calls to exotic Florida. Not to mention people still wanting to get their hands on buttons, stickers, and yard signs. (Unfortunately, there were none to be had.) People offered to drive voters to the polls, staff headquarters, and begged to do just about anything you could imagine.

I have never seen so many people energized for the same cause and offering to do anything they could to help make that happen.

It really got me excited and optimistic about the potential outcome this Tuesday.

Oh, and I also got to meet Simon of Living in Dryden fame, today. Unfortunately only briefly... so there's another plug for his site while I'm recounting my day.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


My favorite letter to the editor... today
From Eric Lerner, City of Ithaca:
I'm encouraged to learn that Randy Kuhl has finally come out firmly in favor of the right to privacy, at least the privacy of elected officials with guns and marital problems.

I'm looking forward to his offering similar support for the privacy of women who must choose how to respond to an unwanted pregnancy, as well as the privacy of all of us at risk from the excesses of the Patriot Act. Or is he only concerned with his own privacy?
Amen.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Off-Track Betting, Yay or Nay?
I've been struggling with how to vote on the Off-Track Betting proposition for a few weeks now. Having a strong libertarian core, I do not lightly consider votes that would limit choices in how individuals spend their time, money, or pursue "happiness." And, let me state for the record that I'm not anti-gambling.

However, few proponents are framing their argument in "freedom of choice" terms. Most are advocating OTB as a financial proposition -- an attempt to increase revenue for the county in tough fiscal times.

I do not support using gambling as a way to shore up the county's coffers, and so I have decided to vote NO on the OTB referendum and am encouraging anyone who reads this to do the same.

The best (and potentially inflated) estimate is that OTB could add an additional $200,000-$300,000 to the county's annual revenues. This figure would be insignificant compared to the total budget, and is especially suspect when compared to potential community costs.

In my search for information I talked with friends who were on both sides of the issue, I read all the opinion articles in the Ithaca Journal and anything "Google-able", and I even downloaded a report released by the University of Chicago on how legalized gambling affects communities (the appendix alone was 134 pages). Research only raised more questions than answers:

What will Tompkins County really gain by inviting OTB to set up shop in Tompkins County? Will the revenue estimates turn out to be correct? (Other estimates on revenue have been as low as $75,000, which is a piddly sum and hardly worth the effort.)

The statewide OTB organization seems to be having some real fiscal trouble. Are we only sending money to other regions of the state to bail out a failing institution?

Is it worth adding another line item to our budget that is neither guaranteed nor consistent?

Will county social services (already facing limited budgets) be able to handle potential increases in requests of services for individuals who may need gambling addiction and/or financial counseling?

And... this is a huge question...

If the county's cut of the proceeds is about 25%, are we prepared to see upwards of $600,000-$900,000 (if their best estimations are correct) leave our community and be used to run and advertise the OTB operations? Money that most likely would have been spent in our local economy if there wasn't an outlet for this type of gambling?

[Vote NO on OTB]
| private feedback | (1) public comments

Friday, October 29, 2004
Voter supression -- "It Will Be Worse Than in 2000"
This might be scarier than anything you'll see on Halloween... Julian Bond's interview on Salon.com, posted at Truthout. Julian Bond is chairman of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Just in time for Halloween
2004's Scariest Halloween Costumes via The Stranger
| private feedback | (0) public comments


More proof republicans just don't get it
From Florida's Hearald Tribune:
Thursday's rally in Madison, at which supporters were urged to walk across town and vote immediately, followed a similar event last month when Leonardo DiCaprio, the actor, appeared on the University of Wisconsin campus and exhorted the audience to follow him onto three buses that would take them to vote.

In Florida, such events have become a staple of the final month of campaigning.

"It's certainly altered our campaigning," said Matthew Miller, Florida spokesman for the Kerry campaign, citing special "early voting rallies" both Mr. Kerry and Mr. Edwards have held. The rallies often end with offers of a free bus ride to the polling site.

William R. Scherer, a Fort Lauderdale lawyer working for the Republicans, said his party had no need for such stunts. "We don't need to bus," he said. "Most of our people have cars."
Uhm...
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Ithaca Political News Round-Up
Barbara Lifton, Ithaca's representative in the NYS Assembly, was at Cornell yesterday talking about how the Bush Administration's policies affect women.

My letter to the editor in support of Dan Cleveland (a cleaned up version of my earlier blog post) was published today in the Ithaca Journal. But there are bunches more to read on the opinion page.

Dan Cleveland was also at Cornell yesterday, discussing the importance of the Clean Money, Clean Elections bill.

Plus, there is no excuse for not knowing where your polling place is. The Journal listed them today.
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Thursday, October 28, 2004
Out of the frying pan, into the fire
If you went to Samara Barend's official campaign site today, you would find a Matt-Drudge-esque huge headline:
ALCOHOL'S SPECIAL INTEREST CONTRIBUTIONS CLOUD KUHL'S JUDGEMENT.
Well, only Randy Kuhl himself knows whether it's special interest contributions or the alcohol itself that's clouding his judgement. Even though the text refers to the 'issue' of drunk driving laws in New York State with no mention of Kuhl's... ahem... problems, we can see this is a thinly-veiled attempt to remind voters of the republican's history with alcoholism without actually saying so. Smear campaign or not, the facts as presented there are a pretty damning record.
As a state legislator in Albany, Randy Kuhl repeatedly voted against tougher drunk driving laws, thereby making our roads more dangerous. In fact, in 1995 alone, Randy Kuhl voted four times against legislation to curb drunk driving.

Randy Kuhl's voting record on drunk driving is so reprehensible, he was the only legislator in the 61-member state senate to receive an "F" from Remove Intoxicated Drivers, a state-wide anti-drunk driving organization. Only one member of the senate received a grade of "D," and all other senators scored a grade of "C" or better.

In 1995, Randy Kuhl:

* was one of only two state senators who voted against a bill that limits a repeat DWI offender's ability to plea bargain (S. 357).
* was one of only three senators who opposed a bill prohibiting adjournments in contemplation of dismissal for Driving While Intoxicated (S. 356).
* was the only senator who voted against requiring the Department of Motor Vehicles to compile a statewide database on drunk driving information (S. 355).
* was one of only three senators who opposed a bill mandating additional penalties for a Driving While Intoxicated offense if a person under the age of sixteen was in the car (S. 364).
And we can see why he'd vote against most of this stuff... I mean, it was in his best interest. Will voters in the 29th district really send this guy to Washington?

Also, I'm dying to see the ads that have been released by the two campaigns in the closing days of this election. Apparently, Kuhl's ad calls Samara Barend a liar. And Barend's ad (in response?) shows actual footage of Kuhl following his being arrested for a DWI.

What a mess. It's times like this I wish I had T.V.

[Newsday.com: Candidates trade harsh TV commercials]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Cornell releases new logo
Congratulations, Cornell, your new logo makes you look like every other university in the country! (Not to say this isn't an improvement. At least your new logo places you in the correct industry... as compared to the JCPenney/Gap-inspired box which could have positioned you as a competitor in the retail clothing market.)


If the development goal was to come up with a logo that would suggest the university's core academic tradition, then I guess it succeeded. I was just hoping the design team could come up with something a little more daring.

The Cornell Identity Guidelines are also online and worth a browse.

[Cornell News: New logo establishes CU's graphic identity]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Wednesday, October 27, 2004
This election is making people crazy
Take, for example, the 18 year old who threatened to stab his girlfriend when she told him she was voting for John Kerry:
He allegedly told [his girlfriend], "You'll never live to see the election."

Palm Beach Sheriff's Office deputies said they had to use a Taser – an electronic stun gun – to subdue him. They described him as enraged and said he was holding [his girlfriend] captive. He was armed with a screwdriver and threatening to stab her in the neck.
OK, we do know that she was also leaving him at the time. There is no indication how much his support for Dubbya played in her decision.

Or, how about the guy that tried to run over Katherine Harris at a Campaign Rally:
A silver Cadillac "swerved off the road and drove up the sidewalk" heading "straight towards Ms. Harris," according to the police arrest report.

After police tried to contact [the driver], he came to to the Sarasota Police station where, according to a police report, he admitted trying to "intimidate" a group of Harris supporters.

"I was exercising my political expression," Seltzer told police, according to the report.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Bush pisses off his base
Tuesday morning Dubbya said he would support civil unions.
"I view the definition of marriage difference from legal arrangements that enable people to have rights. And I strongly believe that marriage ought to be defined as between, a union between a man and a woman. Now, having said that, states ought to be able to have the right to pass … laws that enable people to you know, be able to have rights, like others."
In the final days of a campaign that most strategists agree could hinge on getting your base to the polls, this could potentially play out poorly among Bush's most faithful conservative voters. Some are already responding:
“Civil unions are a government endorsement of homosexuality,” fumed Robert Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute.

“Here’s the truth, civil unions are homosexual marriage by another name,” said Randy Thomasson, executive director of the Campaign for California Families.
[FreeRepublic.com message boards: The Damage Begins]
[NY Daily News: W civil about same-sex unions]
[MSNBC.com: Bush's gay union stance irks conservatives]
[UPI: Bush breaks with GOP on same-sex unions]
[365Gay.com: Bush: Civil Unions OK]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Tuesday, October 26, 2004
Jesus endorses Dubbya
How the Drudge Report missed this one is beyond me. Jesus officially endorsed Bush back in August, at least according to Gerald & Linda Polley, "internally [sic] known psychics who also publish the online magazine, Voices From Spirit which features news from The Afterlife."

Check out the full text of the endorsement as transcribed by the Polley's... and then Jesus's reaction to the first presidential debate... followed by Jesus's condemnation of Dick Cheney for having a lesbian daughter. (Jesus, apparently, doesn't mess around with folks who support homosexuality... you're out of the Book of Life, Dick.)

And if you haven't had your fill of lunacy... check out John Lennon and George Harrison's Official Website from the Afterlife linked from Gerald and Linda's site. In heaven, John and George have endorsed Bush and are keeping the music alive with their new band, Beatles & Friends.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Oregon's 2004 Voter Guide
Oregon is one of many states which has asked its voters to choose whether or not to amend the constitution to define marriage as exclusively between one man and one woman. On the ballot, Measure 36 is entitled:

AMENDS CONSTITUTION: ONLY MARRIAGE BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN IS VALID OR LEGALLY RECOGNIZED AS MARRIAGE.

The state compiles a voter guide, asking organizations to weigh in on the various pros and cons of ballot measures and then prints these in an effort to educate voters. This year, in the 'arguments in favor' of Measure 36, a few entries written by a satirist made their way through the vetting process and into the official guide.

Look specifically for the arguments filed by:
M. Dennis Moore, Traditional Prejudices Coalition;
M. Dennis Moore, Defense of Heterosexual Breeding Coalition; and
M. Dennis Moore, The Beaver State Defense of Beaver Coalition.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


"Kuhlgate"... case closed?
In the continuing saga of who released Randy Kuhl's divorce papers... we finally know. Samara Barend announced that it was, in fact, her campaign manager. Bowing to pressure, the Barend campaign has demoated him for his "error in judgement." Barend maintains she knew nothing about it.

Meanwhile, some particularly absurd theater was happening in Rochester yesterday as Denny Hastert, republican speaker of the house, arrived to endorse shotgun wielding congressional candidate Randy Kuhl.

Hastert maintained that voters will opt for "somebody who, first of all, will tell the truth, somebody who's not involved in dirty tricks. And from what I understand ... she can't stand up to either one of those scrutinies." I don't mean to pick nits Denny, but if this was the case, very few republicans would ever be elected.

Ask yourself, Mr. Hastert, as a member of the pepublican party, if you think you have any credibilty on clean election tactics and truth-telling.

[Newsday: House Speaker Hastert accuses Barend of using "dirty tricks"]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Monday, October 25, 2004
Hillary Clinton in Ithaca
The parade of political notables through Ithaca continued today with Hillary Clinton's stop at Alternatives Federal Credit Union. AFCU was recently awarded a large block of federal money for micro-loans and community development projects.

The tent was packed, and the makeshift stage was set (complete with overturned magazine rack as table and shower curtain rings holding the rope line... noone can say AFCU wastes your money on anything superficial.) The Secret Service detail was working overtime... (I thought I was being cruised by a hot guy in a suit until I realized it was just one of the Secret Service men keeping an eye on the camera case I was holding near my waist. Major disapointment.)

We waited, standing, for nearly two hours. But it was worth it. Hillary was flawless, and when she descended from the stage she began signing things people thrusted in front of her including copies of her book. (Why hadn't I thought to bring mine!?)

UPDATE: Some Press
[WENY: Credit Union Gets A Million Dollar Gift]

Oh, and I need a better digital camera...





| private feedback | (0) public comments


The New Yorker endorses John Kerry
You might be thinking, "Well... duh!" But this is the first time in the magazine's 80-year history that the editors have ever formally endorsed a presidential candidate.

Read the full endorsement at JohnKerry dot com.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Barbara Lifton fundraiser featuring Daniel O'Donnell
For such short notice, Barbara Lifton's re-election fundraiser Saturday night was both well attended and well executed. The food was as fantastic as the guest list, and the home the event was held in was beautiful. I admit I didn't get to try much of the food (including the brie, sorry Lauren) mostly because there were so many great conversations to be had in a relatively short time.

Barbara is a great ally of the LGBT and progressive communities. With her re-election to the state assembly assured (she's running uncontested), most of the casual conversation focused on the national race. Ithaca is not George's bumper stickers were being passed out (not to me, and I am dying to find one), a witty send-up of the Ithaca is Gorges bumper stickers and t-shirts that are so common to anyone who's been in Ithaca. "Why are people already voting in Florida?" (we never did get a real answer to that one despite asking a number of people)... and of course, there was much discussion of the election night party at which the county Democrats will revel in their victories (or begin mourning a very big loss if the rest of the country proves not to be as enlightened as we are).

Besides our assemblywoman, the featured guest for the fundraiser was Barbara's colleague and friend, Daniel O'Donnell. Daniel, Danny for the purposes of the fundraiser and this blog post, represents a chunk of New York City in the assembly. He has a sister, Rosie, who has become an LGBT rights activist in her own right, following a stint as host of a national talk show. (Was that the understatement of the century?) Danny is openly gay, in fact the first openly gay man elected to the state assembly. He and his partner are also plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging New York State's marriage laws.

For all the above reasons, Danny has become a sought-after speaker at national LGBT fundraisers and events, and on the campaign trail. It was not hard to see why. Danny was extremely engaging and witty. He shared campaign anecdotes, assembly rivalries, run-ins with the New York Post gossip column, and some of the pros and cons of having a famous sister.

Besides standing up for progressive causes in the assembly, he's also doing some good work off the floor, acting as a sort of one-man 'Queer Eye' crew. He and Barbara shop together often, and he advises other male members of the assembly with higher ambitions on their wardrobe choices.

Unfortunately, I didn't get to talk to Danny much. I was introduced to him when I first arrived, and we had a brief exchange as he was leaving. He shook my hand and said, "You should be a politician." On what information he based this statement (besides my sniffy new outfit), I have no idea...

... but it definitely got me thinking about ways I could participate in the political system.
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Sunday, October 24, 2004
The magic plastic bag
I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it.

The cashier told Cheri how much her purchase was... she pulled out her credit card and asked him for a plastic bag. I shot a puzzled look back and forth between her and the cashier. He gave her one, and she proceeded to insert her credit card into the bag and then swipe it... with the plastic bag on it. I was like, "Huh?"

Apparently, cards that have magnetic strips that are "dead" and won't be read by the self-scanners can be inserted into a plastic bag and then they miraculously work. (Check out #18 on this page.)

Being me, I had to know why this worked. What did we ever do before Google?
Here's the deal. Standard bank cards use the F2F (Aiken biphase) modulation scheme, in which flux reversals encoded in the . . . eh, too much information. Let's just say that when you swipe the card through the reader, the magnetized particles in its stripe generate a signal with "ticks" in it at intervals that the machine is able to interpret as digital ones or zeros. A scratch or other defect in the magnetic stripe can cause a spike (i.e., brief fluctuation) in the signal that a too-sensitive reader will interpret as a tick, meaning that the encoded data will fail the parity check (the numbers won't add up right) and the card won't work. Wrapping the card in plastic increases the distance between the read head and the magnetic stripe, thus reducing the strength and crispness of the signal and smoothing out anomalous fluctuations. Behold, the card works.
Don't say I never taught ya anything.

UPDATE: From Paul, What also works: a piece of scotch tape across the magnetic strip. Voila! No more plastic bag waste...

That's what I like to hear... magic AND environmentally friendly!
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Cleaning Out The Bookmarks
Just Funny:
Florida Voting Machines Demonstration. (This one was sent to me by a friend who has moved to Switzerland. That's right, folks. Even the Swiss are mocking our elections!!)

MRS. CHENEY'S IRATE RESPONSE TO SENATOR JOHN KERRY'S CHEAP DEBATE REFERENCE TO HER BELOVED DAUGHTER'S VILE AND REPULSIVE LIFESTYLE CHOICE

Visualize John Kerry Winning

Margaret Cho's "Love is Love" television commercial. (Cho: "I made the ad because I wanted to contribute to the whole of democracy, and I wanted to wear a cape.")

Another group for truth... the subject of the latest bush re-election commercial: Wolf Packs for Truth.

Bush Relatives for Kerry. (Please don't vote for our cousin.)
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Friday, October 22, 2004
It's all about the release...
Isn't that always the case?

There is new information in the ever evolving "Kuhlgate" scandal that is rocking a neighboring congressional district. Yesterday, a prosecutor announced that Democratic opponent Samara Barend's campaign manager sent an individual to retrieve "all public information" he could get about Randy Kuhl. It was the clerk who screwed up and gave the individual files he shouldn't have had access to.

So now, Samara Barend and her campaign manager have had to own up to being privy to this information all along, but still deny any responsibility in the 'release' of the files to the press or making them public in any way.

Do we believe them? It sure is getting harder to believe they didn't have something to do with it. If they didn't release them, then who did? Does this prove categorically that they were behind making the divorce records public? Absolutely not.

But do we care? I don't particularly, no.

The fact of the matter is that Randy Kuhl, when originally asked about his divorce records, said there was nothing incriminating in them.

He outright lied, thinking his lie could never be exposed. And much to his dismay, I'm sure, someone rightfully outed him and his violent tendencies. Now he has no choice but to start pointing the finger... anywhere but at himself.

[Ithaca Journal: DA: Kuhl's records obtained by Barend campaign]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Thought-provoking reading
From Remember The Alamo in the New Yorker (sorry, this ruins the conclusion of the article, but the whole thing is definitely worth reading):
In early 2000, writing about Bush in these pages, I said that he seemed to want to become President very badly, but that he did not seem to want to do a lot once in office. Boy, was I wrong! If the voters give Bush a second term, he would, it seems, govern with the goal of a Franklin Roosevelt-level transformation—in the opposite direction, of course—of the relation of citizen to state and of the United States to the rest of the world. He would pursue ends that are now outside what most people conceive of as the compass points of the debate, by means that are more aggressive than we are accustomed to. And he couldn’t possibly win by a smaller margin than last time, so he couldn’t possibly avoid the conclusion that he had been given a more expansive mandate.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Another reason to vote for John Kerry
Bill Clinton as U.N. Secretary General

How phat would that be?!?
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Kerry wins Cornell University mock election
It's a clean sweep... John Kerry is the choice of higher education institutions in Ithaca. John Kerry won the 2004 Cornell Mock Election by 70% to Bush's 22%.

[Cornell University: Cornell Mock Election results: Kerry beats Bush]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Thursday, October 21, 2004
Just for fun
Nerve.com's Completely Unscientific, Completely Partisan, Sexual-Political News Poll Results

... and Politico Hot-or-Not. (Carol Moseley Braun ranks ahead of Ahnold, Dubbya, and Ann Coulter among others on the sexy ranking. Cheney is ranked dead last.)

Via Fleshbot.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Kerry wins Ithaca College mock election
"The numbers, according to organizer Chris Pearsall, pointed to a landslide victory for Democratic candidate John Kerry, who garnered 892 votes, 79 percent of the total to sweep him into office.

George Bush received 170 of the 1,125 votes cast, for 15 percent."


[Ithaca Journal: Kerry wins IC mock election]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


"Kuhlgate" continued
The Ithaca Journal printed an editorial today about the evolving Kuhlgate scandal involving State Senator Randy Kuhl's shocking divorce papers that were obtained illegally and made public by various media outlets. In general, this editorial was more moderate in tone than some others I've read on the topic which practically called for his opponent's head even though there are still no direct connections between the individual who attained the records and Samara Barend's campaign.
The unsavory practice of one politician smearing another probably is as old as voting itself. In this relatively new experiment in democracy called the United States, negative campaigning always has been an integral part of politics.

Through the decades, observers of American politics surely must have asked rhetorical questions such as, "Are voters dumb enough to fall for that?" Given the ongoing popularity of "smear" tactics, one could honestly answer, "Yes."

Potential character defects should be considered in any political race. Does this long-standing state senator have violent tendencies? Is he stable? A violent or unstable person wouldn't be suited for such high office. Then again, in divorce cases incidents are often overblown, exaggerated or even inaccurately portrayed in order to help one ex-spouse and hurt another.

So, before voters step into the polling places Nov. 2, they need to digest the body of information regarding each race, even if they must hold their noses while doing so. That includes serious allegations about Kuhl's past behavior, the possible implication of people affiliated with the Barend campaign, the credibility of such information and its relevance to the ability of a person to represent the 29th District in the House of Representatives.
And basically I agree to everything above. You can aspire to be above the fray, but the sad truth is that if you play nice and the other pulls the surprise, you pay the price. rEpublicans have played nasty for years... two words as a simple reminder, Tom DeLay. Some guy waltzed into the records office and walked off with a file he never should have been given.

Oops. Spilled milk.

I was talking to a friend recently who aspires to be a consultant to political candidates. She wanted to find someone who was above the fray and who "gets that the conversation can't happen in polarity." After thinking it through, we both decided that a candidate attempting to have a conversation just above the fray, outside the realities of politics, was like sending a boxer into the ring and telling them not to throw punches. More often than not, that boxer will lose, and badly.

If you're going to box, you have to do what boxers do. Or in this case, if you're going to run for office, you have to do what politicians do. And, unfortunately, until we all make more than a rhetorical stand otherwise, politicians will play dirty. They spin, they deceive, they moderate their views or exaggerate their opponents' views as necessary and at will.

In this case, if your refuses-to-play-dirty candidate doesn't get elected, then the guy who was willing to sink just a little lower is the one that winds up in Washington passing laws. You can hang tight to your morals and principles, but meanwhile there will be an activist judge placed on the Supreme Court, a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage passed, tax cuts for the wealthy made permanent, no changes to the "Patriot Act", unilateral war against any country "we" see fit, underfunded education mandates, out of control health care costs... well the list goes on and on.

And, as both this editorial says and as I have said before -- nobody would play dirty politics if it didn't get the desired response. Sometimes, it is the only thing you can do to open up a vulnerability and change the dynamics of a race.

But maybe this whole Randy Kuhl thing isn't dirty politics after all. Maybe the guy knew what he'd find in the divorce papers. Maybe he strongly believed that Randy Kuhl shouldn't be allowed to get away with not divulging this information to the voting public. If someone has a history of alcoholism and violence with no evidence of getting help, I might also feel compelled to share with anyone who had to make a decision about entering into a relationship with him... even a relationship as tenuous as representative & constituent.

In an editorial board interview, Randy Kuhl's opponent Samara Barend said:
"I'm not saying that (what happened to Kuhl) is OK, but I'm saying that you have to give up a piece of yourself to represent the people. Your life is pretty much showcased, but at the same time, I recognize that my personal actions and the way I behave in society are up for scrutiny."
Dead on. There are repercussions to our actions, sometimes unforseen and even arguably unfair.

Now that the cat is out of the bag (and notice that at their joint press conference Randy Kuhl and his ex-wife didn't deny any of the content as they begged for privacy), the voters of the 29th New York Congressional District have a huge piece of information. I hope the voters consider that information with the weight it deserves.

[Ithaca Journal Editorial: October surprise: Voters ponder released records]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Tucker Carlson gets ugly
My crush on bow-tie wearing Tucker Carlson is officially over...

And I now have a bigger crush on Jon Stewart.

[CNN Transcripts: CROSSFIRE: Jon Stewart's America]
[CNET: Jon Stewart 'Crossfire' feud ignites Net frenzy]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Bloggers as Sex Toy Test Cases
[ADULT CONTENT WARNING]

Let's take a break from the campaign & politics stuff briefly, shall we? I was over at one of my favorite blogs, Fleshbot, earlier. I was intrigued with a post that began...
Since we had to do something about all those sex toy samples cluttering up the office at Fleshbot Central, today we're debuting an occasional feature where we'll be giving some of them to eminent members of the blogging community and having them report back on their experiences. This week, the indefatigable (and very brave) Toby of Vividblurry goes head-to-head with Falcon's "Signature Collection" Jeremy Penn Supercock ... and lives to tell the tale.
'The tale' is too hilarious for words. Please read it and check out VividBlurry, one of my new favorite blogs.

But, seriously, how does one become an 'eminent blogger'? *big sly grin*
| private feedback | (0) public comments


A Shot of Good News
Top 35 Trends that say Kerry will Take the White House in November via DailyKos via Political Strategy.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Quote of the Day
"We're not going to have any casualties."

George W. Bush, as quoted by Pat Robertson, proving just how out of touch with reality our 'president' really is. Pat Robertson claims that he warned Bush before the invasion of Iraq to prepare Americans for deaths. The above was Bush's response.

[CNN.com: Robertson: I warned Bush on Iraq casualties]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


U.S. Senate Debate at Cornell
Charles Schumer the Democratic incumbent, along with two challengers for his seat in the U.S. Senate--Marilyn O'Grady of the Conservative Party and Howard Mills of the republican Party--squared off in a debate last night hosted by Cornell.

Schumer is running on his very strong record of accomplishment. O'Grady and Mills were attempting to twist or oversimplify his record and hang it around his neck at every turn.

For his part, Schumer barely responded to the accusations. Mills kept claiming that the only bills Schumer ever introduced and got passed were of little consequence. Schumer responded that of course the way that real work gets done in congress was by lobbying agencies, applying pressure to regulatory bodies, and attaching amendments to legislation.

I was hoping for a less simplistic argument from Mills for why Schumer should be replaced. Being a republican member in the Democratic controlled state assembly, Mills ought to know how tough it is to pass legislation in unfriendly legislative bodies. Mills came off as an overambitious upstart. My advice to him: try the State Senate or the U.S. congress next time... before you tackle statewide office.

The one thing I will say about Mills is that I was impressed how socially moderate he was as a republican. He supports a woman's right to choose and he strongly supports civil unions. He said a few times that the only reason O'Grady is even running as the Conservative Party nominee is because of his stance on abortion and LGBT issues. In left-leaning New York State, republicans can't get very far in state-wide politics without moderating their social views, and this was on spotlight last night.

While I appreciate Mills' supportive positions on social issues, I could still never advocate voting for him. There are more issues that he and I don't agree on... like approving Bush's activist judges without question and making all of Bush's tax cuts permanent, among others.

I am curious how Marilyn O'Grady got included in this debate but not the other third-party candidates who are left-of-Schumer on the ballot. This is not a race that Schumer has to worry about, his reputation among both major parties in New York State is pretty high. He'll win this race in a walk. And his chances were only strengthened by O'Grady being included in the debate because any exposure the 'conservative' candidates get from these debates will be shared.

O'Grady argued that a woman's right to choose should never have been called a constitutional right, that gays and lesbians should get none of the rights afforded to straight couples, and that the president's tax cuts should not only be made permanent but that we should go straight to work on implementing even more of them. Yikes.

The best part of the debate was when Schumer got a little bit of life talking about the importation of prescription drugs from Canada. He became adamant that he supports the immediate reimportation of drugs from Canada and that this whole line about the safety of the drugs is 'bogus', and an attempt by Bush to sideline the issue that he should be taking action on.

The Cornell Daily Sun endorsed Schumer following the debate.

[Cornell Daily Sun: Senatorial Candidates Square Off at C.U.]
[Ithaca Journal: Senate hopefuls debate at Cornell]
[Ithaca Journal: Opponents gang up on Schumer: Student sample stick with their candidates]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Tuesday, October 19, 2004
The Ballot
I've had a few people ask me what's on the ballot. Well, in just two short weeks, residents of the city of Ithaca will be standing in a voting booth looking at a ballot that resembles this PDF (as made available by the Tompkins County Board of Elections). Voters will get to register their choices on one resolution and five representative positions.

OFF-TRACK BETTING RESOLUTION
Shall Resolution No. 181 of 2003, authorizing the County of Tompkins to join the Catskill Region Off-Track Betting Corporation be approved?

PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
George Bush/Dick Cheney (Republican Party; Conservative Party)
John F. Kerry/John Edwards (Democratic Party; Working Families Party)
Ralph Nader/Jan D. Pierce (Independence Party)
Ralph Nader/Peter Miguel Camejo (Peace and Justice Party)
Roger Calero (Socialist Workers Party)
Michael Badnarik (Libertarian Party)

UNITED STATES SENATOR
Howard Mills (Republican Party)
Charles Schumer (Democratic Party; Independence Party; Working Families Party)
Marilyn O'Grady (Conservative Party)
Abraham Hirschfeld (Peace and Justice Party)
Martin Koppel (Socialist Workers Party)
Donald Silberger (Libertarian Party)
David McReynolds (Green Party)

UNITED STATES CONGRESS
William Brenner (Republican Party)
Maurice Hinchey (Democratic Party; Independence Party; Working Families Party)

STATE SENATOR
George Winner (Republican Party; Independence Party; Conservative Party)
Daniel Cleveland (Democratic Party; Working Families Party)

STATE ASSEMBLY REPRESENTATIVE
Barbara Lifton (Democratic Party; Working Families Party)
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Pragmatic Idealism
Rep. Barney Frank spoke to a healthy crowd at Uris Hall last night. He began with a discussion of Isreal-Palestine relations and the ways in which the Israeli government could change policy to become both more secure and more democratic. He then transitioned into a talk about LGBT rights here and in Israel. He made the case that Israel has one of the best track records when it comes to LGBT rights, much better than the U.S. in a lot of respects. Gays are allowed to serve openly in the military, and he said Israel begun a silent policy of granting asylum to gay and lesbian Palestinians.

I appreciated the discussion of LGBT issues in the context of the broader Israeli/Palestinian struggle because the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is an issue that I have remained relatively naive about.

The most thought-provoking part for me came during the Q&A. A student asked if Rep. Frank ever felt the need to moderate his positions on issues because of his sexuality. He said that he didn't, and he talked about his frustration with people who saw pragmatism and idealism as opposites. He said that idealism without pragmatism doesn't help anyone. Idealism sets your agenda for a better world, and you accomplish this vision in pragmatic steps. For example, if you can accomplish civil unions and then come back later demanding full marriage equality, that's OK. I agree with him. Small steps often begin to breakdown misperceptions and make tackling the next fight easier.

Rep. Frank also said something I have often suspected... that John Kerry's position on same-sex marriage might be politically motivated and less-than-genuine. (He has never asked John Kerry about it, so he didn't know for sure if this was the case.) But when an eleoquent, well-spoken man doesn't fully articulate his position, one explanation could be that the position is more politically motivated than a firmly held belief (i.e. Kerry may be more left-leaning on gay marriage than he can let on during a national campaign).

Check out the Cornell Daily Sun's write-up of the talk. One thing I'd like to correct, however, is that Rep. Frank was the first openly gay member of congress, but is not the only openly gay member. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Jim Kolbe of Arizona are also out and serving their respective constituents in congress.

[Cornell Daily Sun: Rep. Barney Frank Speaks About LGBT Rights, Israel]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Monday, October 18, 2004
New York Times Endorses John Kerry
[John Kerry] has qualities that could be the basis for a great chief executive, not just a modest improvement on the incumbent.

We have been impressed with Mr. Kerry's wide knowledge and clear thinking - something that became more apparent once he was reined in by that two-minute debate light. He is blessedly willing to re-evaluate decisions when conditions change. And while Mr. Kerry's service in Vietnam was first over-promoted and then over-pilloried, his entire life has been devoted to public service, from the war to a series of elected offices. He strikes us, above all, as a man with a strong moral core.


Read the entire endorsement at Truthout.
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Friday, October 15, 2004
Rep. Barney Frank to speak at Cornell
The first openly gay member of congress (and probable candidate for senate when John Kerry wins the presidency) will speak at Cornell on Monday. His topic will be Victories Won, Challenges Ahead, Gay Rights in the US and Israel.

[Mock Election 2004: Events Calendar]
[Congressman Barney Frank]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


LGBT... A?
The asexual community is beginning to define itself and demand a place at the sexual minority table. Will we officially add an "A" to the roster of sexual minorities? From NewScientist.com article:
In a world where lust can be bought in a pill and skin is the marketing tool du jour, being David Jay cannot be easy. At the age of 22 he has never had sex. He has never experienced sexual attraction towards another person and does not believe it will ever happen.

...

Until recently these people felt isolated, never suspecting others felt the same. But now, thanks in great part to an online forum founded by Jay, they are finding each other and identifying themselves with a common label. They call themselves asexual, and are coming out to parents and loved ones, declaring their asexuality to be as valid an orientation as being straight or gay.

They are printing T-shirts and pamphlets, and discussing the concept of “A-pride” and what it means to be “A-sexy”. They are, essentially, announcing to the world that they are not broken or defective, or sexually dysfunctional. Instead they have a bona fide sexual identity that must no longer be ignored.
[Asexual Visibility and Education Network]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Thursday, October 14, 2004
New York State Accepts Gay Marriages Performed in Canada
At least in matters relating to New York State retirement benefits.
New York State and Local Retirement System will treat Canadian marriages of same-sex couples the same as any other marriage for purposes of retirement benefits and obligations.

...

The decision was made by New York State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi, whose office has jurisdiction over the retirement system. It was communicated in a letter from the Comptroller to Mark Daigneault, a state employee who wrote in September asking how getting married in Canada would affect retirement benefits for him, his same-sex partner and their two children.

...

"New York State law is clear; marriages validly executed in other jurisdictions must be respected in this state," said Alphonso David, Staff Attorney with Lambda Legal.
[NY state accepts Canadian gay marriages]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Quote(s) of the Day
Last night, John Kerry and Dubbya were asked whether or not they thought homosexuality was a choice. Dubbya said he didn't know and gave some lame answer about respecting everyone. John Kerry had this to say:
"We're all God's children, Bob, and I think if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who is a lesbian, she would tell you that she's being who she was. She's being who she was born as. I think if you talk to anybody, it's not a choice."
Lynne Cheney was quick to voice her opinion on John Kerry and his response:
"Now, you know, I did have a chance to assess John Kerry once more and now the only thing I could conclude: This is not a good man. Of course, I am speaking as a mom, and a pretty indignant mom. This is not a good man. What a cheap and tawdry political trick."
Lynne was introducing her husband at a post-debate rally. The Veep stayed mum on the subject. Elizabeth Edwards weighed in to remark:
"She's overreacted to this and treated it as if it's shameful to have this discussion. I think that's a very sad state of affairs. I think that it indicates a certain degree of shame with respect to her daughter's sexual preferences. It makes me really sad that that's Lynne's response."
Will those be the last words...?

UPDATE 10/15: Dick Cheney cranks it up a notch:
"You saw a man who will say and do anything in order to get elected. And I am not speaking just as a father here, though I am a pretty angry father, but as a citizen."
Funny, isn't this the same guy that politely thanked John Edwards for a comment along similar line during the VP debate?

John Kerry responded in a statement:
"I love my daughters. They love their daughter. I was trying to say something positive about the way strong families deal with this issue."
Amen.

P.S. If you really want to read the height of ridiculousness, check out the transcript of Rush Limbaugh's on-air comments.

[Guardian: Lynne Cheney Upset With Kerry Over Remark]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Sicky
I've got whatever cold or flu is going around... so bear with me while I try to get well and posts are sparse. :-(
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Tuesday, October 12, 2004
The mud is flying, close to home...
I am not above perpetuating internet sleaze, especially when it speaks poorly of any member of the "party of family values." (Hey, if your party wants to build it's foundation on the backs of the hypocritical religious right, then your torrid not-so-recent history is fair game as far as I'm concerned.)

In the next congressional district, a very short drive from Ithaca, Randy Kuhl (R) is campaigning against Samara Berand (D) for an open seat vacated by moderate Amo Houghton (R). It was generally thought to be an uphill but winnable battle for Barend, as the district is mostly reigstered republicans and republican-leaning independents.

But this may have changed. Things may have just gotten a tad easier for Barend as Kuhl's divorce records have been released. They are not pretty. From The Blue Lemur:
New York Republican state senator John “Randy” Kuhl, who is vying for a spot in the U.S. House of Representatives, once brandished two shotguns and threatened to shoot his wife at a dinner party, according to divorce records acquired by RAW STORY.

Kuhl engaged in “cruel and inhuman treatment and other such conduct as may render it unsafe and improper for the plaintiff to cohabit with the defendant,” the divorce court’s finding of fact stated. According to the documents, he solicited other women, humiliated his ex-wife and refused to seek treatment for his drinking.

Kuhl’s divorce records document manifold emotional abuse towards his ex-wife, mostly under the influence of alcohol. They show that the senator had a history of drinking to excess and repeatedly refused to seek counseling for his condition.

The most serious charge leveled by Kuhl’s ex-wife was that he wielded two shotguns during a dinner party and threatened to shoot her.

“In or about 1994, while the parties were hosting a dinner party at their home, the defendant took out two shotguns and threatened to shoot plaintiff,” the record says.

The remaining allegations are of soliciting other women, abuse, humiliation and refusing to seek treatment for his drinking.
[Scans of Randy Kuhl's Divorce Papers]
[Daily Kos: NY-29: Redacted divorce papers are up]
[Map of Congressional District #29]
[Raw Story (Liberal news with an edge)]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Felicia's Atomic Lounge Opens
The bar that I've been to 3 times over 8 days... Felicia's Atomic Lounge.
The lounge occupies the space formerly known as Enuwan Cocktail and Oyster Bar, next door to the gimme! coffee shop in the middle of an emerging trendy micro-neighborhood.

"We love the neighborhood," said Houghtaling.

"Being next door to gimme! coffee, it's an ideal location," Sauter said. "Our theme is any friend of gimme! is a friend of ours. They hang out on our steps during the day, and we hope they'll come back at night."

Once up the steps and inside the door, customers are greeted with a metro melange of brushed aluminum walls, blues, purples and blacks, and a well-stocked bar with beers and wines in reserve.

"We wanted something you'd find in the city, we wanted to have a metro, sleek urban look," said Sauter.
[Ithaca Journal: New bar enjoys a lively opening]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Monday, October 11, 2004
Look out FOX News
There's a new network vying to be GOP-TV.

The Sinclair Broadcast Group, the network that ordered seven of its ABC-affiliated stations NOT to air a Nightline segment that featured a reading of the names of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, is now ordering all 62 of its stations to air an anti-Kerry movie commercial-free in prime time.
Media Matters for America, a watchdog group, has written a letter to Sinclair asking the company to cancel reported plans to air the film between now and the Nov. 2 election, the group said in a statement.

"Sinclair's plan to air anti-Kerry propaganda before the election is an abuse of the public airwaves for what appears to be partisan political purposes," Media Matters CEO David Brock said in the letter.

The letter warned Sinclair that its plan could constitute a violation of broadcast regulations requiring equal time for political candidates, as well as the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.
See if you live in a market with a Sinclair Broadcasting Group station, and contact them to let them know how irresponsible and inappropriate their partisan programming is.

If you don't want to call one of the local stations, but still want to register your disgust... the company's email address is: comments@sbgi.net

UPDATE: Sign the Petition & Get More Information.

[CNN Money: Anti-Kerry film to air in prime-time]
[Media Matters]
| private feedback | (0) public comments


If I only had T.V.
If I had T.V. I would have gotten to spend more than three hours with my family yesterday. Mom, my brother, and my two nephews came for a visit and quickly exited when they realized they might have to miss a Sunday afternoon football game.

Over lunch Mom coyly said, "So, you have T.V., right?" I replied, "I have a T.V., but no channels." She responded in disbelief, "Are you kidding me!?"

I was not.

They ended up spending less time with me than they spent in the car driving to and from Ithaca.

I shouldn't be terribly shocked. Growing up, this is how my family socialized. You turned on the television and you all sit in silence in the living room watching whatever was on. Maybe every half-hour or so you'd ask someone a question... all to keep up the appearance of quality time.

I guess the decision to deny myself cable (in favor of reading and other mentally-stimulating activities outside the home) has now officially prevented any future family visits.
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Saturday, October 09, 2004
Good To Be In D.C.
The sequel to the hysterical internet movie, This Land, was just released. It's called Good To Be In D.C., and the content is decidedly more... gay. Via PoliticalWire.
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Friday, October 08, 2004
Nader Campaigns in Ithaca
Ralph Nader's speech drew nearly 1,000 to the State Theatre last night. I decided since I didn't have time to make a witty anti-Nader sign to hold during the speech, that I would do laundry instead.

The Ithaca Journal had a write-up this morning:
During a humorous moment, Nader asked the crowd how many smoked marijuana. When nearly two-thirds of the crowd raised their hands, he used the opportunity to attack what he called a drug war that resembled "Medievalism"

"You do not send alcoholics to jail," he said. "You do not send nicotine addicts to jail. You should not send nonviolent drug addicts to jail either."
[Ithaca Journal: Nader goes on attack]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Thursday, October 07, 2004
Cornell to Host Schumer, Challengers in Senate Campaign Debate
Democratic Senator Charles Schumer on Wednesday agreed to two debates against Republican challenger Howard Mills and the Conservative Party's candidate, Dr. Marilyn O'Grady.

The first debate will be hosted by WABC-TV in New York City on Sunday, Oct. 17, from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. The second, co-sponsored by Cornell University and the League of Women Voters, will be held on Tuesday, Oct. 19 at Cornell in Ithaca, from 8 p.m. to 9 p.m.

[Newsday: Schumer agrees to two debates]
[Ithaca Journal: Schumer, faces 2 in debate Oct. 19 at Cornell]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Boycott for change?
This Friday, October 8th, is the National Boycott for Equality. The Ithaca Times printed an article today entitled "Local gay rights activist encourages boycott of goods". When I first heard about it, I thought this boycott was a bunch of crap. After checking out their web site, it seems like a huge bunch of crap. I haven't seen anything like this since the email that encouraged all of us to not buy gas for a day in hopes that the major oil companies would shudder at our sheer power as consumers and drop prices. And, as we're all aware, THAT boycott worked like a charm.

Pardon my sarcasm.

Now don't get me wrong. I don't spend money at places I know aren't gay-friendly. I think it's responsible to be as educated a consumer as possible and to withhold your money from companies that don't reflect your values. I also think it's responsible to engage in TARGETED boycotts, when individuals refuse to purchase from specific companies. No company wants their name attached to bad publicity. How many copmanies pulled out of advertising on Dr. Laura's ill-fated television show because of the threat of boycotts? This was a successful action. Not only did it shine light on Dr. Laura's homophobia and bigotry, but some major advertisers took notice that the gay community might just put them on the "shit list," a place they didn't want to be.

But a widespread, one-entire-day-only, buck-shot protest by not consuming ANYTHING? Ridiculous. Here's what this boycott asks you to do:
1) Withdraw $80 from your bank account via ATM. This is the symbolic average daily contribution of gay people to the economy.

2) Call in sick or use a personal/vacation day. If you own a business, consider closing for the day to honor the goal.

3) Do not purchase or buy ANYTHING.

4) Do not use your cell phone for the entire day. We are planning on GLBT citizens to disappear for the day so that our fellow citizens feel the loss of our presence in their lives.
A lot of symbolism but not much real effectual outcomes. Not only will this boycott not work on its technicalities -- how many gays are going to stay home on a perfectly good Friday night? -- but if you follow all these recommendations, there will still be absolutely NO lasting effect on Saturday, October 9th. NONE. (Well, that's not true, you'll have one less sick/vacation day.)

No one company is going to be hurt financially, the economy will continue to hum, and no reliable numbers of the effects of the boycott will be available to show the impact. ("Hey, did Bob call in sick cause he got that flu that was goin' around or was he showing support for that gay boycott?")

If I can't convince you that you're wasting your time even thinking about this, and your wallet does drop off the face of the earth on Friday... at least do something good with your day off. Friday is also the last day in New York to register to vote. Go out on a voter registration drive. Or, better yet, volunteer at the local Democratic Party headquarters.

But, if you want to see real change, if you want to make sure that we aren't constitutionally disciminated against. If you want to make sure we come one step closer to getting the rights we deserve as citizens in this country, vote! Vote the right way and encourage others to do so. Tell pollsters that you're gay or an ally and that you're voting for John Kerry because he's the best shot we have at equality in 2004.

Forget this Boycott for Equality crap, you'll be much more likely to see change on Nov. 3rd than you will on October 9th.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


The Gay Marriage Question
Unlike the Vice Presidential debate of 2000, last night's debate between Dick Cheney and John Edwards saw some real fireworks over the war in Iraq and the economy.

And just when you thought it couldn't get any more hostile, the moderator asks a question about gay marriage. In answering the question, there was actually a moment of recognition between the VP candidates, and the debate became degrees more civil. Here's the exchange with some garbage weeded out:
MODERATOR: Next question goes to you, Mr. Vice President. I want to read something you said four years ago at this very setting: Freedom means freedom for everybody. You said it again recently when you were asked about legalizing same-sex unions and you used your family experience as a context for your remarks. Can you describe, then your administration’s support for a constitutional ban on same-sex unions?

CHENEY: Gwen, you’re right. Four years ago in this debate the subject came up and I said then, and believe today, that freedom does mean freedom for everybody. People ought to be free to choose any arrangement they want. It’s really no one else’s business.

/Clip/

That would be my preference.

/Clip/

And the fact is that the president felt that it was important to make it clear that that that’s the wrong way to go, as far as he’s concerned. Now, he sets policy for this administration and I support the president.

MODERATOR: Senator Edwards, 90 seconds.

EDWARDS: [L]et me say, first, that I think the vice president and his wife love their daughter. I think they love her very much. And you can’t have anything but respect for the fact that they’re willing to talk about the fact that they have a gay daughter, the fact that they embrace her. It’s a wonderful thing. And there are millions of parents like that who love their children, who want their children to be happy.

/Clip/

MODERATOR: New question but same subject. As the vice president mentioned, John Kerry comes from the state of Massachusetts, which has taken as big a step as any state in the union to legalize gay marriage. Yet both you and Senator Kerry say you oppose it. Are you trying to have it both ways?

EDWARDS: No. I think we’ve both said the same thing all along. We both believe that, this goes to the end of what I just talked about, we both believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. But we also believe that gay and lesbians and gay and lesbian couples, those who have been in long-term relationships deserve to be treated respectfully. They deserve to have benefits. For example, a gay couple now has a very difficult time one visiting the other when they’re in the hospital. Or, for example, if heaven forbid one of them were to pass away they have trouble even arranging the funeral. Those are not the kinds of things that John Kerry and I believe in.

/Clip/

MODERATOR: Mr. Vice President, you have 90 seconds.

CHENEY: Well, Gwen, let me simply thank the senator for the kind words he said about my family and our daughter. I appreciate that very much.

EDWARDS: You’re welcome.

MODERATOR: That’s it?

CHENEY: That’s it.
Short of getting down on one knee and proposing, it really couldn't have been any sweeter a moment. And didn't you get the sense that Dick Cheney's comment about having never met John Edwards before this debate was a bit more wistful than accusatory?
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Tuesday, October 05, 2004
Kerry's 'Cream-and-Sugar' Base
Recent polling suggests Kerry would be wise to invest in ad placement on the back of sugar packets:
Among all coffee drinkers, President Bush and Senator John Kerry are tied at 44 percent. But among black-coffee drinkers, Bush leads 48 percent to 42 percent. Kerry takes the cream-and-sugar crowd by a margin of 50 percent to 36 percent.

How do we know this? Someone actually researched it, believe it or not, at 7-Eleven, which sells a lot of coffee.

The research, conducted by Penn, Schoen & Berland, was released to coincide with the convenience store chain’s second quadrennial Presidential Coffee Cup Poll, which lets customers cast their “votes” by buying their coffee in 20-ounce cups bearing the name of either Bush or Kerry. Plain cups are available for undecided voters, third-party candidate supporters or those who want to keep their preference to themselves.

In a season of silly, product-driven “polls” by American companies, at least 7-Eleven can claim one of the largest sample sizes. In 2000, the “poll” drew some 6 million “votes” and was remarkably accurate, with Bush edging out Al Gore by one percentage point. The current contest continues through Nov. 1.
[The Hill: Under The Dome]
| private feedback | (0) public comments

Monday, October 04, 2004
FB vs. FWB
I used to just be the guy that reads the funny-looking pinkish-orangish colored newspaper (New York Observer) at the cafe. I have been upgraded to the crazy guy that reads the pinkish-orangish colored newspaper and laughs hysterically in the middle of a packed cafe. All thanks to an article called Farewell, My Fuck Buddy:
This is where the F.B. triumphs over the F.W.B. An F.B. can grab an Amstel and the leftover lo mein out of your fridge, but there’s no going out for drinks or dinner or hanging out with mutual friends. (Hopefully there are no mutual friends.) F.B.’s know that snuggling should be reserved for couples in relationships and teddy bears in fabric-softener commercials. There is an implicit "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy and no date-y scenarios. Unlike with F.W.B.’s, you’re never privy to the other person’s extracurricular activities and, thus, not upset by them. The F.B. knows that when an F.W.B. sees their "friend" about to "benefit" from someone else, gauntlets will be thrown, usually along with a drink.
Thanks, New York Observer.
| private feedback | (0) public comments


Vote or Not
From Jim and James, the makers of Hot or Not, comes Vote or Not. Go there, you could win $100,000! (Seriously!)
| private feedback | (0) public comments


"You can't change the weather."
I was glad to read that the Out For Undergraduate Business Conference went well. As for an update on the 'Drama, Drama, Drama' post from last week... the student ended up making a few non-apology, "thank you for your concern, but I'm still 100% in the right" phone calls.

So I wouldn't hold my breath to see apologies going over the list-serv any time soon. That's a shame.

I was talking to a friend about the situation Friday evening. I said that every interaction with this person, both personal and 'professional' going back to when I first met him, has been odd or inappropriate in some way. He just doesn't seem to have a clue about how to interact with another human being.